What Makes Agentic AI Different, and Dangerous
Traditional AI predicts outcomes; agentic AI takes action. That shift is not merely technical—it fundamentally changes what effective governance requires.
Conventional governance models were built for systems that are largely static, predictable, and bounded. Agentic AI, by contrast, operates with autonomy, adapts in real time, and interacts dynamically with other systems and actors. These characteristics push beyond the assumptions embedded in existing oversight frameworks, introducing new forms of operational, compliance, and mission risk.
This white paper presents a practical framework to help federal leaders realize the benefits of agentic AI while maintaining rigorous governance, transparency in public decision-making, and alignment with federal policy and regulatory expectations.
The Agentic AI Lifecycle: A Phased Approach to Governance
Effective governance for agentic AI must scale with both system autonomy and public impact. As these systems evolve from constrained assistance to independent action, the rigor, scope, and mechanisms of oversight must evolve with them.
This white paper defines three distinct phases of the agentic AI lifecycle, each with escalating governance requirements and differentiated controls calibrated to risk, mission criticality, and regulatory exposure.
The Integration Strategy: Augmenting What You Have
Most public sector agencies operate in hybrid environments that combine modern platforms with long-standing legacy systems. Governance strategies must account for this reality.
Rather than providing a rigid set of rules, we identify two primary strategic pathways for governance, depending on an organization’s current infrastructure maturity. This white paper outlines two governance pathways based on an organization’s current infrastructure maturity. These archetypes provide a practical way to evolve toward the hybrid architecture described in this paper.
To connect strong governance for data at rest with the oversight required for agents in motion—without creating fragmented compliance processes—the paper defines four principles for successful integration:
-
- Specialization of tools
- AI observability
- API-first integration
- Hybrid architecture
Ready to Build Governance Capabilities that Enable Responsible Innovation?
As agencies move toward agentic AI, confidence depends on more than experimentation. It requires governance frameworks that ensure systems behave responsibly, comply with regulations, and deliver measurable mission outcomes.
This white paper:
- Defines three phases of the Agentic AI lifecycle, with escalating governance requirements and risk-based controls.
- Outlines key principles for successful integration, including an approach to addressing latency challenges that impact performance.
- Identifies six critical shifts needed to evolve existing governance frameworks for agentic systems.
Learn how to move beyond rigid, role-based controls toward dynamic, risk-aware oversight designed for autonomous agents.
